Post-Combine 7 Round Washington Redskins Mock Draft

| March 2, 2013 | 23 Comments

Note: This mock draft assumes that in free agency, the Washington Redskins, as Kevin has suggested, look to add players like Corey Lynch or Greg Toler, giving the Redskins a little more latitude to take a best player available approach in the draft. So here we go.

2nd Round.) Gavin Escobar, Tight End, San Diego State

YouTube Preview Image

 

The closer we move to free agency, the more likely it seems that Fred Davis will be leaving in free agency, especially if we can’t get our cap number in check. Logan Paulsen is a great try hard player, but the likelihood of him developing into a productive tight end in our offense isn’t very high. When looking back at how Mike Shanahan and Kyle Shanahan used the tight end in Denver and Houston, they tend to like to have one more traditional in-line tight end (a Daniel Graham or a Joel Dreessen, if you will), and a “move” guy that you can move anywhere on the formation (a Tony Scheffler or Owen Daniels).

If Logan plays the more traditional in-line role, then San Diego State’s Gavin Escobar would be the perfect guy to complement him. Escobar has a huge wing span and solid hands. He’s a little underrated as a blocker (though he does still need a little work on his technique), and while he’s not the fastest tight end in the draft, he’s got more than enough speed to give linebackers trouble and be a handful to cover in the slot.

 

3rd Round.) Ryan Swope, Wide Receiver, Texas A&M

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

The Redskins have a solid collection of outside receivers when you look at the make up of their roster. They have Pierre Garçon, Josh Morgan, Leonard Hankerson, Dezmon Briscoe, and even the speedster Aldrick Robinson is better suited for playing inside. The only “true” slot receiver they have is Santana Moss, and his cap hit in 2013 is over $5 million, not to mention that he’ll be a free agent come the end of the season. That means that we need to start thinking, in earnest, about a replacement.

 

Swope reminds me of a more athletic…Brandon Stokley or Danny Amendola. (HA! I know what you thought I was going to say, but I am not going to mention him.) He’s a shifty receiver in the slot, making it hard for larger corners to get their hands on him, and too fast for safeties and linebackers to cover him. His route running is an underrated part of his game, and he’s not afraid to take a shot across the middle. He needs to work on not body catching the ball as often as he does, but he makes the catch most of the time despite that, so it’s more of a minor coaching issue that can be fixed as he gains more time in the offense.

 

4th Round.) David Quessenberry, Offensive Tackle, San Jose State

 YouTube Preview Image

One of the little ways I tend to judge a prospect, is if the first time I watch him, I go “whoa”. It happened with Robert Griffin III. Sometimes you just watch a guy work and say “that guy is going to be a good one.)

San Jose State’s David Quessenberry is one of those guys. The first time I really watched him was during Senior Bowl practices, and the guy leapt out immediately. Even as a relatively small school guy, he played and competed with the best of them. He’s projected as a guard, but I think he’s got the length and the strength to play outside at right tackle and be a book-end to Trent. if not, he’s a good enough athlete that he can play inside as well, if we’re to assume Tom Compton is eventually going to be the right tackle. He’s got a little bit of a mean streak too, which is always a plus in linemen.

 

5th Round.) Johnathan Franklin, running back, UCLA

 YouTube Preview Image

Mike Shanahan always takes a running back. It’s like clockwork. Alfred Morris had an incredible rookie season; any other year, he would’ve been a shoe-in for rookie of the year. But, he’s already getting a high odometer, and if we want him to have a long, productive career, we need to give him a back to spell. In addition, Morris only had 11 catches on the season; the “3rd down back” Evan Royster didn’t do much better with only 10 catches, and Darrel Young totaled eight. This offense is hard to defend, but it’d be harder to defend if we had a back who could catch the ball out of the backfield, and run the ball outside to bring the outside zone-runs full into our offense.

Franklin can catch the ball out of the backfield, he’s willing to pass protect and does a pretty good job of it, and he’s got the kind of breakaway speed that Morris, while totally awesome, doesn’t have. His measurables are similiar to Roy Helu, Jr, only he has a cleaner bill of health and doesn’t run quite as upright as Helu. In the event of a Morris injury, he’d be more than capable of handling the load for an extended period and our offense wouldn’t lose it’s explosiveness.

 

Imagine a pistol formation with Morris and Franklin in the backfield. That headache you just got? That’s how defensive coordinators would feel, having to defend the inside dive, the outside zone and the read option quarterback run.

 

5th Round.) Jamar Taylor, cornerback, Boise State*

 

*Originally I picked Darius Slay here, but thought better of it. No way Slay is around in round 5.

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

Kevin wrote an article about Jamar Taylor a couple months ago, and I’ve come around on him recently. Taylor excels in man coverage, and for a guy his side, he’s very physical and a good tackler, including a very good tackler in the run game. Boise State also sent him on blitzes; he’s a corner capable of laying the wood and imposing his will. If he can work on his zone coverage and looking back for the football (then again pretty much no corner looks for the ball anymore; it’s one of my biggest scouting pet peeves), he’s a guy who can start for the Redskins down the line, likely after Josh Wilson’s contract expires at the end of 2013.

 

 

6th Round.) Rashard Hall, Free Safety, Clemson

 

YouTube Preview Image

This is one of the deeper safety classes in recent memory, but one of the things that sort of gets left out that analysis is that, while that’s true, it’s much deeper in strong safeties, or guys who thrive near the line of scrimmage, then in the center field, Cover 1 type of safeties that would be a much better fit in Jim Haslett’s defense. That’s one of the many problems we have without our safety play; we have a lot of guys who thrive near the line, but suffer out in coverage.

Madieu Williams is a true centerfielder…but he also sucks.

Hall is one of the few guys I saw really playing the center field safety role. I think he showed some really good range and football instincts playing for the Crimson Tigers. He’s a good tackler and the kind of late round guy you can develop into a starter later down the line, and a guy who can play special teams while he develops.

 

7th Round.) Matt Furstenberg, TE, Maryland

That’s right; I’m taking a second tight end in this draft. Remember what I said about Quessenberry—about saying “whoa?”. Furstenberg, a completely unknown tight end from Maryland, ran a 4.62 40, caught the ball well in the gauntlet, and performed well in all the other drills. The University of Maryland has been plagued by bad quarterback play for years, so Furstenberg’s production isn’t particularly great.

However, his physical measurables make him the kind of guy I want to have in my camp to see if he can reach his full potential. Taking him in the draft, rather than waiting for undrafted free agency, insures he’s in my camp.

 

Undrafted Free Agents

Matt Scott, Quarterback, Arizona: Matt Scott played pretty well in his senior season, replacing Nick Foles. Scott’s got some quirks in his motion and needs help with his accuracy, but he’s got a pretty good arm, he’s athletic, and his comeback drives in Arizona’s bowl game victory suggests he’s got a little fire in him as well.

 

 

Questions, comments? Follow me @kcclyburn on Twitter.

About the Author:

Filed in: DRAFT
×
23 comments
Allthingsdc
Allthingsdc

This is the absolute worst mock draft ever. You should quit "crunching tape" ASAP. I'm willing to bet you are a borderline window licking helmet wearing retard.

thekingrobert
thekingrobert

Don't know if I like the Escobar pick with the 2nd round pick I'll like to go corner instead but wouldn't be mad if we picked a pass catching TE. Franklin isn't bad because his speed would bring a change of pace back and he has KR experience. I like the Jamar Taylor pick because he can play CB/FS and i'm a sucker for speed. Rashad Hall concerns me with his lack of aggression. 3rd round WR would be nice too wouldn't mind an LB in the 3rd or 4th and maybe a RB with 5th or 6th.

pablo escobar
pablo escobar

dude then all i can say is you arent a very good evaluator of talent. :/

pablo escobar
pablo escobar

also, i apologize that i made a mistake saying that you projected franklin in the 6th. but here's the deal, it doesnt matter because hes not even getting close to the 5th round. that's how outrageous these picks are. and quite bitching that people arent giving you friendly negative comments. no one expects to get treated with "kids gloves" (as you would say) so you shouldnt expect to get them in the first place. we are adults here (also, as you would say)

pablo escobar
pablo escobar

regardless swope and franklin arent falling that far in the draft. it's just not happening. why did you try to turn the attention on the way i typed a quick blog statement? im typing this on my phone bro, chill. this is sports talk not english class. with that being said whether or not they address secondary problems in free agency none of the guys you chose are going to be a redskin simply because they wont be on the board. also what makes it seem as though to you that they are going through free agency for defensive backs? i have not heard a single thing about anything they are doing and im willing to bet you havent either. the tightend pick is totally out of left field as well. we have bigger needs. you are the reason why redskin fans get a bad rep. you are just hoping for the big named players. because seriously thats what you did, you picked some of the biggest names, decided you really wanted them, and threw them in your mock draft. it seems like im not the only one back lashing at you for these picks so maybe you should check yourself and stop being so defensive.

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

Right. I'm hoping on the big names. I don't spend hours crunching film or watching tape or reading up on a prospect at all. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Rob
Rob

You have a comments line and then you attack the poster who comments? Also, seriously, you’re an adult, grow up. If we go offense with our first 2 picks, Shanny should fire himself. Our defense is old at some key spots and we need some youth. London is done, I love his heart but he is done. Nothing at safety at all with Hall as a starter, if it wasn't for Jay Cutler that one game, he would be a third option at best for a good team. Corner or safety with the 2nd rounder and more defensive help with the 3rd rounder ILB corner or safety. Shanny can get RG3 a target or 2 with the 4th-5th rounders. Before you say BPA, you can't afford that luxury when you have huge holes on defense, you need to try to fill a huge need.

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

Once again, I have to bring up Kirk Cousins. Last season, Kirk Cousins was a luxury we couldn't afford. We had too many holes elsewhere to "waste" a pick on a quarterback when we had already drafted a quarterback. What a waste of a pick, Cousins is never going to get on the field, he's never going to help us, we're not going to get our pick back for him. And then Kirk Cousins helped us win versus Baltimore, and won a game on the road when we absolutely needed a win to keep in the playoff hunt. And suddenly, Kirk Cousins isn't a luxury that we can't afford anymore. Suddenly he's great value in the fourth round. That's why you go BPA and follow your board. You have to do so with an eye on your needs, but if you feel like you're not getting value for those needs you take the best player on your board. You don't reach for a prospect you aren't in love with just because you need to fill a hole. That's the way great organizations do it and that's the way we've done it.

Joe
Joe

Matt Scott as a rookie a FA eh? Intelligent draft discussion is, evidently, not for everyone. Neat writing I suppose, but I was hoping for better than neat/ridiculous guesses. Odd how defensive you are with people considering how absurd this "article" is. There isn't any chance that Washington goes with pass catchers with their first two picks. This draft is loaded with things the Skins actually need, try again. Your "jersey shore style" replies provide some entertainment, so thank you for the laughs. There is a better chance of you getting drafted than there is of Scott going undrafted. fwiw.

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

Wow, we have a clairvoyant on our hands. Can you tell me the lotto numbers, since you so clear know exactly what's going to happen in the draft? Clearly you've got some insight into our front office that we don't have. Those who have thoughtful, constructive criticism and just want to talk football, get talked to in the same thoughtful manner. Those who comment just to be sarcastic jerks, get the same sarcastic tone back in their face. It's pretty simple. Tyler D wrote a very good post where he didn't agree with my picks. He explained his POV, I explained mine, and he may not necessarily agree with mine and I may not agree with his, but we did so in a civil manner. When you come around and act like a dick, don't expect to get treated with kid gloves.

pablo escobar
pablo escobar

dude.. swopes is going to go way before the end of the third round and franklin is definitely not making it to the 6th. and just because you broke down film on d. hall and decided he was good you didnt address our biggest area of need till the 5th round?? you dont have to break down anything to see that our secondary was piss poor. get out of here with this. not a single one of these guys will be a redskin. write that down and take it to the bank

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

Thanks for the feedback. Such thoughtful, non-capitalized analysis is always appreciated. Also, I mocked Franklin in the fifth round. Also, I said this assumes we address safety and corner in free agency, which seems to be the plan. Also, you need to read better. Also, seriously, you're an adult, use punctuation.

Pauli
Pauli

I like it but I have hard time believin that Taylor will drop that far after combine. Franklin is awesome but isnt he more like 3-4 rounder? Can you reason a bit why you think those guy will drop? Otherwise great mock, well reasoned. Glad to see you Rashard aswell, right now he is THE sleeper FS.

TylerD
TylerD

Ok I do agree with much of what you replied with. Of course it's important to rebuild on both sides of the football and I do advocate finding a 3rd down back to complement Morris and with the likely departure of Fred Davis we will need another TE. Having said that Logan Paulsen (and I know I'll catch heat for this) did, I think, remarkably well in Davis' absence especially in blocking and while he doesn't have "nimble" hands he caught passes when we needed him to. I'd like to find a TE a bit later in the draft than the 2nd round. You are correct in saying this draft class, as deep as it is in secondary players, doesn't have exactly what the Redskins are looking for. If I hear one more person say we need to pick up Ty Mathieu in the 4th I will lose my shit. But if Matt Elam is there at 51 I think he is a viable option. He's fast and athletic enough for cover 1 and cover 3. I don't think he'll be there though and lord knows we shouldn't attempt a trade up for him, we don't have a god damn thing to trade. London Fletcher I do think has played his last redskins football which is downright rotten (I'm wearing a 59 jersey as I type this) because despite his age he was more productive than most of our defensive players last year. If he comes back for another year I think it will e after getting released and then renegotiating a HEAVILY reduced one year contract. I don't see many ILB who could start right away for us either but it should still be a focal point in the coming month. As for Ryan Swope, he's a solid player and we would benefit from having him BUT shoring up a position where your only backup is sexyrexy is a little different from rebuilding one with arguably 5 very good options. I guess we'll see how it goes, and thank you for the response it's always nice to talk a little football

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

I love Logan, don't get me wrong. I find myself wishing they had tried to get him involved a little more, but Logan's not really the kind of tight end they're really looking for. And I absolutely love Matt Elam. I think he could play either free safety or strong safety, but I don't think he's going to be there at 51, honestly. As for London, according to Pro Football Focus, London ranked nearly at the bottom of every category they track. Perry quietly had a pretty damn good season. The only real guy I like there is Jon Bostic, but he's a little bit more of a thumper than a guy who can cover out in space. I appreciate the feedback.

TylerD
TylerD

I'm sorry but Adam is right on this one.. I did like your defense article for D-Hall but we have a solid core of receivers none over 1000 yards but Garçon was out half the season and his production could easily be +1,000 yards next year. Swope in the third round (I'm not convinced he'll still be on the board) is a luxury we really can't afford. He's also right about Fletcher. the rumor mill is exploding with sentiment that he'll be released. If that happens we need someone who can do their best to fill that void immediately. Saying our defense will already be better next season when Injured starters return is obvious. Safety should be the priority then corner then TE then anyone who can do a better job than Tyler Polumbus then RB then everything else.

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

I give Adam crap because he didn't take the time to write out a post as thoughtful as yours. I don't think there's sentiment that Fletcher will be released. He may retire, but at this point, it's a 50-50 shot. Some days it seems like he'll come back, some days it doesn't. I did this mock draft assuming Fletcher will be back for another year. That, and no inside linebackers have really caught me eye of being able to come in and fill in for Fletcher. I think Perry and Keenan Robinson can carry that torch for London, and if we can re-sign Lorenzo Alexander, there may be an inside linebacker on the board there. I don't think there's a linebacker than can come in and start immediately in this draft outside of the first couple rounds, and none of them really fit what we need from our linebackers. The same goes for safeties. What we really need is an athletic, rangey safety who can play the deep middle of the field in Cover 1 and Cover 3. This is a deep class of safeties, but many of the safeties in this draft thrive closer to the line of scrimmage. The guys who can play the center field, like Baccarri Rambo and/or Josh Evans, are solid guys, but I wouldn't start the day 1 at free safety if I could avoid it. I think the best way to fix our situation at safety is to sign a guy like Corey Lynch and draft a developmental guy later. I feel the same way about corner, and I feel like we've got a bunch of corners on the roster; D-Hall, Crawford, Wilson, Chase Minnefield if he comes back healthy. At some point your just piling up at a position and you're going to have to start cutting people you want to keep or letting talent you just drafted risk getting picked up if you try to waive them to the practice squad. And a "luxury pick" is only a luxury until he plays well. Last season, Kirk Cousins was a "luxury we couldn't afford". Until the Robert Griffin III got hurt, and suddenly that pick looks genius. With Santana on the books for over $5 million, plus him being a free agent, I felt it'd be smart to have a replacement in the wings to fill that role. It's not really about one receiver having 1,000 yards as it's about giving Robert as many options as possible. Our offense already gives teams fits. The problem teams get is that they figure "okay, this side of the ball is set, now let's focus on in on this side." The goal should be improving both sides. I feel the defense can be best improved by guys getting healthy and with smart deals in free agency, and that the offense is best improved through the draft at key positions.

Tony w
Tony w

I don't agree with taking a TE. With our first pick. With other needs it seems unlikely. Finding a starter on the o line, or a starter in the secondary. But, hey, what do I know.

Ryan Ferrario
Ryan Ferrario

I would prefer balancing our team by improving the defense, but value must be considered. One could certainly make the case that we could improve as a team by upgrading the offense from very good to great. With free agency and players returning from injuries, the defense could improve without using the draft much. I don't really believe that there is a "right" answer with the draft. With any given pick a team can usually help itself with a handful of guys. Great write up!

RWJ
RWJ

Cly, I like it! We need some weapons for RG3. We have Perry who can fill the ILB position. IF we get Toler and Lynch the DBs in the later part of the draft fill our other secondary positions. I like Swope in the 3rd but if Stedman Bailey is still available we should draft him instead. Other than that, this is a rock solid mock.....RWJ

Adam
Adam

We have one of the worst secondaries in the nfl, (which two mid level FA signings won't fix) and we have a major hole at ILB with fletch likely retiring and we don't take a DB till round 5, we don't take an Ilb prospect at all and we take 2 TEs and a WR? I'm sorry, but I think it's the worst mock I've seen for the redskins this offseason.

KC Clyburn
KC Clyburn

I appreciate the feedback. You're wrong, but I appreciate it.

%d bloggers like this: